“Àki”, Rodrigo Rodriguez, from the album “Inner Thoughts” (2006)
Even as thou seekest the truth, the truth that thou seekest thou shalt find. So finding a relevant post while considering the mocking commentary of the trolls whenever I include some portion of “Divine Intimacy” in my posts I herewith re-post from Fr. Hunwicke’s site:
“Continuing to consider Archbishop Lefebvre’s book, from my own background in Catholic Anglicanism, I discern in it more than a whiff of that admirable Anglican Ulsterman,C S Lewis. Not that Archbishop Lefebvre, I am sure, will have read him; but because first-rate Christian thinkers so often, laudably, converge.
Take a particular tricky theological problem: explaining how souls rooted in a false religion may find their way to God, without asserting – or leading others to think you mean – that all religions are more or less as good as each other: ‘syncretism’ or ‘indifferentism’.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Mgr Lefebvre writes ” … in the false religions, certain souls can be oriented towards God; but this is because they do not attach themselves to the errors of their religion! It is not through their religion that these souls turn towards God, but in spite of it! Therefore, the respect that is owed to these souls would not imply that respect is owed to their religion”.
And: ” … these religions [he has just mentioned Islam and Hinduism] can keep some sound elements, signs of natural religion, natural occasions for salvation; even preserve some remainders of the primitive revelation (God, the fall, a salvation), hidden supernatural values which the grace of God could use in order to kindle in some people the flame of a dawning faith.
But none of these values belongs in its own right to these false religions … The wholesome elements that can subsist still belong by right to the sole true religion, that of the Catholic Church; and it is this one alone that can act through them”*.
I think this is admirably expressed, and it reminds me strongly of the penultimate chapter in Lewis’s The Last Battle. A young Calormene, brought up in the worship of the false god Tash, meets the Lion Aslan, the Christ-figure in Lewis‘s rich narrative. “Then I fell at his feet and thought, Surely this is the hour of death, for the Lion (who is worthy of all honour) will know that I have served Tash all my days, and not him. …
But the Glorious One bent down his golden head and touched my forehead with his tongue and said, Son, thou art welcome. But I said, Alas, Lord, I am no son of thine but the servant of Tash.
He answered, Child, all the service thou hast done to Tash, I account as service done to me. Then by reason of my great desire for wisdom and understanding, I overcame my fear and questioned the Glorious One and said, Lord, is it then true … that thou and Tash art one?
The Lion growled so that the earth shook (but his wrath was not against me) and said, It is false. Not because he and I are one, but because we are opposites, I take to me the services which thou hast done to him. For I and he are of such different kinds that no service which is vile can be done to me, and none which is not vile can be done to him. … Dost thou understand, Child?
I said, Lord, thou knowest how much I understand. But I also said (for the truth constrained me), Yet I have been seeking Tash all my days. Beloved, said the Glorious One, unless thy desire had been for me thou wouldst not have sought so long and so truly. For all find what they truly seek”.
Note: “…these religions [he has just mentioned Islam and Hinduism] can keep some sound elements, signs of natural religion, natural occasions for salvation; even preserve some remainders of the primitive revelation (God, the fall, a salvation), hidden supernatural values which the grace of God could use in order to kindle in some people the flame of a dawning faith.”
Truth-teller: At a time when intellectual fashion was on the Left, historian Robert Conquest had the guts to lay out, in devastating detail, the truth about the blood-soaked Soviet experiment
But what is one to find in the worship of self and the corollary deprecation of all others of all religions which might kindle a “flame of dawning faith”? What can one find in Atheism, the ultimate worship of self, which might kindle the “flame of faith” in the Divine?
Back in the day, there was a term in use in some quarters which precisely described those who sincerely believed a ideology or philosophy which was empirically provably wrong. That term was “useful idiots“.
Robert Conquest was the principle proponent of of this “Useful Idiot” terminology to describe the “Brights” of his day.
Back then, the Soviet Union appeared in rude health and the old men in Moscow ruled an empire based on fear. It is easy now to forget just how terrifying the Cold War (WW III) seemed. Across the Western world, many (including most in the military) doubted Communism could be defeated without unleashing nuclear Armageddon.
The Trudeaus and Castro
What is more, many Western intellectuals — from Marxists such as Communist historian Eric Hobsbawm and his friend Ralph Miliband (a political theorist at the London School of Economics, a devout follower of Marx and an unswerving believer in revolutionary socialism) (and coincidentally one of Pierre Eliot Trudeau’s professors during PET’s time at the London School) to woolly, well-meaning Lefties in universities across the country — were quick to defend the (Soviet) regime whenever it was criticised.
Lenin and Stalin, these ‘useful idiots’ claimed, had been much misunderstood. It was Conquest, more than any other writer of his generation, who did most to expose this deceitful drivel.”
So too in the spiritual realm, the “Useful Idiots” uphold the narcissistic adoration of self as the “ultimate good” and consider man as the pinnacle of all things.
These poor benighted souls are the useful idiots of the spiritual world, those unknowing followers of the dark one, the “Father of Lies”, who has existed for all of man’s history and never ceases to strive to drag all souls down to his realm of darkness.
Perhaps one of the best portrayals of how this process works in the spiritual realm is C.S.Lewis’s book: “The Screwtape Letters”.
The principle tenant of the doctrines of communism, socialism, fascism, secularism, and all the currently fashionable “isms” of the progressives is that man is the measure and pinnacle of all things, in other words “self worship”.
This is THE fundamental plank of the platform, the defining characteristic of all secular progressives and a defining characteristic of all those who mock believers of every stripe, lumping all who do not share their religion of self worship into the single pot of “those superstitious fools”, not the enlightened elite like “We Brights” who have put aside the “crutch” of religion.
This “crutch” is in reality a “life-ring” in a sea of desolation, and this action by the worshipers of self is a blessing for traditional religious believers, namely all those who believe in a Supreme Being above man, because:
“… The immediate action of creatures, especially if their malice has a share in it, makes it more difficult for us to discover the divine hand. A greater spirit of faith is necessary here, that we may pass beyond the human side of circumstances, the faulty way of acting of such and such a person, and find, beyond all these human contingencies, the dispositions of divine Providence, which wills to use these particular creatures, and even their defects and errors, to file away our self-love and destroy our pride. … “
This mockery of the “Brights” strikes directly to the roots of pride in ourselves, our attachment to esteem and the respect of others, hence the blessing in such mockery. Our attachment to the things of this world must be ripped up root and branch and replaced with attachment to God.
“Ride of the Valkyries”, Budapest Symphony Orchestra, from the soundtrack of the movie Watchman, (2009)
Really feeling much less understanding and contemplative today … so lets look at things in the news:
Poltroon: An ignoble or total coward; a dastard; a mean-spirited wretch. Word Origin & History: poltroon “spiritless coward,” 1529, from M.Fr. poultron “rascal, coward,” from It. poltrone “lazy fellow, coward,” apparently from *poltro “couch, bed” (cf. Milanese polter, Venetian poltrona “couch”), perhaps from a Gmc. source (cf. O.H.G. polstar “pillow,” see bolster).
Read a post by David Warren yesterday about “closure” that wonderfully evocative emotional “thing” which Progressives confuse for compassion and charity.
LAS VEGAS, NV – OCTOBER 01: People scramble for shelter at the Route 91 Harvest country music festival after apparent gun fire was heard on October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada. A gunman has opened fire on a music festival in Las Vegas, leaving at least 20 people dead and more than 100 injured. Police have confirmed that one suspect has been shot. The investigation is ongoing. (Photo by David Becker/Getty Images)
Withstanding the media and political tsunami of tears and wailing from all the usual sectors is exhausting and breeds depression and before I drown in my misery while seeking closure about the tragedy in Vegas I decided to reprise a post I made back in mid 2016 after the Orlando shootings. Make no mistake about it, the Vegas event WAS A TRAGEDY, but all the subsequent noise and posturing and virtue signalling completely missed the point and the essence that is tragedy.
The big tragedy is the private hell of all the undeserving folks who were victims of the shooter in Vegas. The little daily tragedy is that the survivors are being exploited and abused by all the usual suspects for all the usual agendas without the slightest concern for the real needs of the survivors and families of the victims and those very victims who were lucky enough to survive the event.
And the real perpetrators of tragedy give themselves a pass, they give themselves cover on all their virtue signaling by being sure to mention just how great the first responders, firefighters and police behaved! Gee what a tragedy! Time to ban guns! Blah! Blah! Blah! Knees just jerking all over the place and drooling gibbering emoticons in suits babbling about how they have to control people for their own good.
Hillary slammed for ignorant gun remarks after Vegas tragedy
What about the much talked about fact that the bad actor had absolutely NO religious affiliations – NONE! Can anyone remember what this sort of behaviour used to be called? “Possessed by Demons”, really, not just some Hollywood horror script. Yes Virginia, demons exist and are happy to insert themselves into human affairs at every opportunity. Especially easy targets are amoral drifting humans with no religious affiliation.
The modern predilection for denying the existence of God and the supernatural really doesn’t mean that God and the supernatural stopped existing suddenly when “all that stuff” went out of style. I happen to believe in the existence of demons and the demonic. It does offer the only way that I am aware of to explain or account for acts which all the talking heads and politicians brand “senseless”.
Visiting a great blog site called (appropriately) Internet Monk we find:
C.S. Lewis writing at his desk
“Whenever we consider the subject of demonology, it is hard to ignore the contributions of C.S. Lewis. In the modern era, few have stimulated the imagination with regard to the spiritual realm as much as the author of The Screwtape Letters. The book, dedicated to his friend and colleague J.R.R. Tolkien, begins with two quotes:
“The best way to drive out the devil, if he will not yield to texts of Scripture, is to jeer and flout him, for he cannot bear scorn.” (Luther)
“The devill . . . the prowde spirite . . . cannot endure to be mocked.” (Thomas More)
This Lewis proceeds to do in masterful literary fashion. Through witty epistles, he captures the cleverness and wiles of Satan’s agents as well as their ultimate shortsightedness and folly.
This series of letters and memos comes from a senior demon (Screwtape) to a younger protege, his nephew Wormwood — a “Junior Tempter” — regarding Wormwood’s assignment to damn the soul of a human being known only as “the Patient.” A portion of one of the letters pertinent to our discussions this week deals with modern humanity’s view of the existence of spirits and the Devil.
Here is Screwtape’s counsel about how to best exploit that.” … :
from the C.S. Lewis book “Screwtape Letters” chapter VII :
My Dear Wormwood,
I wonder you should ask me whether it is essential to keep the patient (that would be humans) in ignorance of your own existence. That question, at least for the present phase of the struggle, has been answered for us by the High Command (that would be Satan). Our policy, for the moment, is to conceal ourselves.
Screwtape Letters, by C.S. Lewis
Of course this has not always been so. We are really faced with a cruel dilemma. When the humans disbelieve in our existence we lose all the pleasing results of direct terrorism and we make no magicians. On the other hand, when they believe in us, we cannot make them materialists and sceptics. At least, not yet.
I have great hopes that we shall learn in due time how to emotionalise and mythologise their science to such an extent that what is, in effect, belief in us, (though not under that name) will creep in while the human mind remains closed to belief in the Enemy (that would be God).
The “Life Force”, the worship of sex, and some aspects of Psychoanalysis, may here prove useful. If once we can produce our perfect work – the Materialist Magician, the man, not using, but veritably worshipping, what he vaguely calls “Forces” while denying the existence of “spirits” – then the end of the war will be in sight.
But in the meantime we must obey our orders. I do not think you will have much difficulty in keeping the patient in the dark. The fact that “devils” are predominantly comic figures in the modern imagination will help you. If any faint suspicion of your existence begins to arise in his mind, suggest to him a picture of something in red tights, and persuade him that since he cannot believe in that (it is an old textbook method of confusing them) he therefore cannot believe in you.”
So, yeah, demons and demonology do in fact provide a “sensible explanation of “senseless” events and actions, although, at present, such beliefs are seriously out of fashion amongst the “intelligentsia” and the “proles” of our Secular Progressive Modern “Enlightened” society. Why, of course we no longer believe in demons and demonology. We are so much more sophisticated than those primitive superstitious peasants of the European Middle Ages or Medieval Period.
The Medieval age, “The Dark Ages”, began with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. The Medieval Period lasted from the 5th to the 15th century – like, man, that’s about a thousand years, eh? Gee, we moderns have only been believing what we believe for about a hundred years or so, right?
Our Lady of Medjugorje, Bosnia and Herzegovina
I sometimes wonder if the occasional mass murder spree by some lone wolf perp with no discernible religious affiliation is the Demonic equivalent of the Divine apparitions like Our Lady of Fatima and other such Divine apparitions.
It’s not much of a stretch, once you think of it, to imagine Demonic apparitions demonstrating the power of the Devil to counter the Divine apparitions such as Our Lady of Guadalupe, Mexico, Our Lady of Fatima, Portugal, Our Lady of Medjugorje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Our Lady of Czestochowa, Poland, and so on, many such Divine apparitions are reliably recorded but mainly ignored by our sophisticated mainstream society. A pretty complete list of Marian Apparitions is located here.
Our Lady of Guadalupe, Mexico
So think about it for a moment, a Demonic apparition to counter all the many Divine apparitions? It’s not really so far fetched as one might first think. Is there any slightest possibility that a thousand years of experience might have given the Medievals a more realistic, in depth, understanding of the supernatural?
I mean, really, the so-called “Dark Ages” weren’t really very dark. Some of the brightest minds in history flourished in the “Dark Ages” and did a much better job, under much worse conditions, of keeping Western Civ alive and well than our current crop of brilliant “Brights”.
Like, man … what’s the difference in believing in the supernatural and believing in “science”. Except for the various flavours of magicians it’s all just magic anyway for the mythical man in the street, right? Can any of you explain how an integrated circuit or a radio telescope works – nope? There ya go, just magic again, on to the next 30 second sound bite, the next Tweet, the next Facebook post. David Warren has an interesting little post concerning how the Devil makes use of humans, so go and read the whole thing here.
“Prophecy” Adrian von Ziegler, from the album “Feather and Skull”, (2013)
Meanwhile, back to my previous post from June 18th 2016
We are blessed to live in an age where for the first time in history the poltroons are running ALL government and media channels and the progressive narrative is poured over us 24/7, world without end, amen.
When faced with evil we are confronting a binary choice – do something about it, or don’t do something about it. Doing something about it requires guts, brains, courage, grit, self sacrifice, willingness to speak truth to power, willingness to die for what we believe in, the list is endless. All of the above qualities and talents are utterly lacking in the denizens of the government universe and the media universe.
Therefore we get the second option – don’t do anything about it. But that creates a quandary for management because; by every definition “leaders” have to be seen to be “doing something”. So the question becomes “How do we do nothing while appearing to be doing something?”
The answer is “Hell! Let’s focus on the implements of destruction!” Because we all know the proles are just scared know-nothings who will believe that all crimes of violence are actually committed by “Autonomous Self Propelled Seeker Drones” called “Assault Rifles“.
WHOOOO! The modern bogyman we can use to push our agenda on all the innocent because we are too weak to actually do something about the guilty evil actors. Because if we ever once acknowledged evil we would logically have to include ourselves in that category and we sure don’t want to do anything to hurt ourselves, right?”
Except where noted, the rest of this I lifted wholesale from here. Please go to the site and read the whole piece. The author makes perfect sense, not that that has ever had any impact whatsoever on the Progressive Brights who have the knee jerk “Ban Guns” response every time the media start frothing about the latest (and rare) murder committed with guns.
****Tactical Style .22 rimfire “Assault Rifles”. A .22 cal Àssault Rifle for assaulting gophers … OY!
” ... If the cosmetic features used to define an “assault weapon” in the 1994 law strike you as really stupid ways to define an “assault weapon,” it’s because the 1994 law was a stupid law with stupid definitions written by stupid people.
(Blog Note: and while we are on the topic, I have never heard anyone who knew anything at all about guns ever suggest that a .22 cal rimfire was a reasonable facsimile of an “Assault Weapon”, as in something one could use in an actual assault on a defended stronghold. We use .22 for varmint popping, it`s for children’s toys.
In the real world the term assault rifle implies a caliber of at least 5.56 x 45 in aBullpup Assault rifleor, even, preferably 7.62 x 51 in an FN C2A2or even, possibly, a civilian 308. But a .22 rimfire assault rifle – don`t make me laugh)
And not only was it a stupid law, it was a stupid law that didn’t even accomplish its stated goal. How do we know? Because today, more than a decade after the law’s expiration, the number of people murdered by rifles is 36 percent lower than it was during the last full year the assault weapons ban was in effect.
ISIS Islamic Warrior or member of NRA – GEE they all look the same to me. Quick! Better ban guns!
The law expired in September of 2004, making 2003 the last full calendar year in which the law was in effect.According to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) crime statistics, 390 people were murdered with rifles in 2003, making rifles the weapon of choice in 2.7 percent of murders that year.
But in 2014, more than a decade after these vile weapons of war flooded American streets, the number of rifle murders surely skyrocketed, right? Not so much. Quite the opposite. In 2014, the most recent year for which detailed FBI data are available, rifles were used in 248 murders.
And not only are rifles used in far fewer murders over a decade following the expiration of the 1994 gun ban, they’re also used in a smaller percentage of homicides. In 2003, when the gun ban was in full effect, rifles were used in nearly 3 percent of murders. In 2014, they were used in barely 2 percent.
That’s the exact opposite of what gun banners said should happen. After the assault weapons ban, guns were supposed to flood the streets and just start killing people. Crime was supposed to skyrocket. But that’s not what happened. Yes, Americans bought a ton of rifles after the law expired, but rather than going up, the number of homicides in which rifles were used drastically fell. There were way more guns, but way less crime.
She cut off their tails with a carving knife …
Are you ready for a mind-blowing statistic? In 2014, you were six times more likely to be murdered with a knife than you were with a rifle. Knives were the weapon of choice in 1,567 murders in 2014, according to the FBI. It gets crazier. You were also nearly three times more likely to be killed by someone’s fists or feet than you were to be murdered with a rifle. In 2014, 660 people were murdered with what the FBI calls “personal weapons”–hands, fists, feet–compared to 248 with rifles.
In the United States, knives are more deadly than rifles. So are fists. And feet. This is not my opinion. It is an incontrovertible fact. And it’s a fact that highlights a point that far too many people refuse to acknowledge: the human desire to kill is far more deadly than any weapon. Weapons do not of their own volition and agency decide to kill people. That requires human intervention. Humans hell-bent on death and destruction will get their hands on whatever tools they need to wreak their desired havoc. Restricting the use of those tools by innocent people who only want to protect themselves and their families is delusional madness.
Yet here we are. Rather than blaming individuals and ideologies, the leading lights of American society have decided to demonize inanimate objects. Despite the fact that the terrorist in Orlando was a radical jihadi who pledged allegiance to ISIS, (and the shooter in Vegas was not affiliated with any religion) our Progressives have decided to blame the NRA for what happened. Even though the terrorist was registered to vote as a Democrat, (and the Vegas shooter had no known political affiliation) … Democrats have decided that Republicans are the true culprits.
This is apparently how 2016 is going to go. If a boy tells you he’s a girl, then he’s a girl. If an Islamic terrorist who pledges allegiance to ISIS tells you he’s killing for Allah, then he’s probably a Republican with a lifetime NRA membership. After all, Islamic terrorists don’t kill people; peaceful, law-abiding citizens who believe the Second Amendment means what it says kill people. And lone wolf, demon possessed murderers who kill themselves when they suddenly understand the horror of their own actions are obviously right wing nut jobs – BAN GUUUUNSSSSSS!!!!!
Collective leftist denial about the existential, radical Islamic threat facing America is not going to prevent Islamic terrorism. Gun bans that ban guns based on nothing more than scary-looking cosmetic features are not going to prevent radical Jihadis from murdering innocent people. Pretending that Republicans and the NRA are the real villains is not going to prevent ISIS from killing more Americans. Ignoring the fact that these attacks seem to only happen in gun-free zones won’t prevent violent psychopaths from waltzing into those gun-free zones and gunning down the unarmed civilians who congregate there.
But all those things will make progressives feel better about themselves, and who are you to deny them that right?
We don`t let them have ideas, why would we let them have guns
But not one item of fact will have any affect on the decisions made and directions pursued by the Progressive Poltroons making political hay or the media talking heads babbling on and on calling for gun bans.
Because they are most afraid of guns – in the hands 0f their own citizens! The Poltroons are most afraid of we the people … that would be … US! Their own law-abiding citizens are their worst nightmare. What’s next? Banning Assault Boots?
Quoting from the above article: “Are you ready for a mind-blowing statistic? In 2014, you were six times more likely to be murdered with a knife than you were with a rifle. Knives were the weapon of choice in 1,567 murders in 2014, according to the FBI. AAAAAGH!!! BAN KNIVES! (AND WHILE WE ARE AT IT LETS INCLUDE FORKS AS WELL, THEY LOOK KIND OF DANGEROUS WITH ALL THOSE POINTY PARTS!)
Assault Boots (aka Black Combat Boots)
It gets crazier. You were also nearly three times more likely to be killed by someone’s fists or feet than you were to be murdered with a rifle. In 2014, 660 people were murdered with what the FBI calls “personal weapons”–hands, fists, feet–compared to 248 with rifles.” Gee Wiz! Assault Boots are black, with heavy cleats, and laces, and are provably three times more dangerous than Assault Rifles! Who KNEW! AAAAAAGH!!! BAN ASSAULT BOOOOOTS!!!!!!
From where I sit, logic and facts have no place in the progressive narrative. I sometimes wonder if this cognitive dissonance I am experiencing, this pervasive unease, is how the regular folks in the Roman Empire felt around 475 A.D. just before Romulus, the last of the Roman emperors in the west, was overthrown by the Germanic leader Odoacer, the first Barbarian to rule in Rome, and who ushered in those mythical Dark Ages our modern sophisticates so enjoy mocking.